Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:47:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:47:14 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:23044 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:46:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20010211223011.H3748@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:30:11 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Mikulas Patocka , Pavel Machek Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jens Axboe , Marcelo Tosatti , Manfred Spraul , Ben LaHaise , Ingo Molnar , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Alan Cox , Steve Lord , Linux Kernel List , kiobuf-io-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait In-Reply-To: <20010208001513.B189@bug.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: ; from Mikulas Patocka on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:52:35PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > So you consider inability to select() on regular files _feature_? > > select on files is unimplementable. You can't do background file IO the > same way you do background receiving of packets on socket. Filesystem is > synchronous. It can block. You can use helper friends if VFS layer is not able to handle background IO. Then we can do it right in linux-4.4. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/