Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:26:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:26:08 -0500 Received: from 5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.163.116]:3756 "EHLO 5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:26:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:34:16 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Mark Rutherford cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? In-Reply-To: <3E1313A8.18854119@justirc.net> Message-ID: References: <3E1313A8.18854119@justirc.net> X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1109 Lines: 30 On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Mark Rutherford wrote: > I would LOVE to see Nvidia open source, > We cannot force our ideas on a company, all they will do is turn and walk away. > We can show them our way, if they like it, good. if not, we tried. Nvidia is a smart company, otherwise they wouldn't be in business today. I'm sure they'll switch to the GPL only once it will be in their advantage to do so and no sooner. When would it be an advantage for them ? The moment there is a GPL graphics library (at the right system level, of course) that's so good Nvidia won't be able to resist using that library could be such a moment. A new project for Hell.Surfers ? ;) regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/