Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:30:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:30:28 -0500 Received: from itg-gw.cr008.cwt.esat.net ([193.120.242.226]:40711 "EHLO dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:30:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 01:38:45 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Jakma X-X-Sender: paulj@dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com To: David Lang cc: Paul Jakma , Rik van Riel , , , Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 893 Lines: 28 On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, David Lang wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Paul Jakma wrote: > > further, the kernel's licence explicitely exempts the 'normal system > > calls', and kernel headers describing these can quite arguably be > > considered to fall within this exemption. > > this is exactly the reasoning that nvidia uses to justify their use of the > headers. a kernel module does not make of use of the calls the exemption refers to. it calls exported /kernel/ functions. > you can't have it both ways. > > David Lang regards, -- Paul Jakma Sys Admin Alphyra paulj@alphyra.ie Warning: /never/ send email to spam@dishone.st or trap@dishone.st - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/