Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:51:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:51:02 -0500 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:6019 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:51:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:58:36 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: "David S. Miller" Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ak@suse.de, paulus@samba.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modules 3/3: Sort sections Message-ID: <20030101205836.A30574@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: "David S. Miller" , rusty@rustcorp.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ak@suse.de, paulus@samba.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk References: <20030102030044.D066C2C05E@lists.samba.org> <20030101205404.B30272@twiddle.net> <20030101.205003.37279830.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030101.205003.37279830.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 08:50:03PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 658 Lines: 17 On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 08:50:03PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Incidentally, why do we do strstr(name, ".init") instead > of strncmp(name, ".init", 5)? Is there any particular > need for the .init to come at the end? > > I think this is to get .foo.init sections. Obviously. Perhaps the question was worded badly. Instead read it as "Why don't we force this to be called .init.foo instead?" r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/