Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:49:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:49:06 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:28090 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:49:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 20:50:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030101.205003.37279830.davem@redhat.com> To: rth@twiddle.net Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ak@suse.de, paulus@samba.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modules 3/3: Sort sections From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030101205404.B30272@twiddle.net> References: <20030102030044.D066C2C05E@lists.samba.org> <20030101205404.B30272@twiddle.net> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 537 Lines: 13 From: Richard Henderson Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:54:04 -0800 Incidentally, why do we do strstr(name, ".init") instead of strncmp(name, ".init", 5)? Is there any particular need for the .init to come at the end? I think this is to get .foo.init sections. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/