Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129092AbRBLL2x>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:28:53 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129107AbRBLL2d>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:28:33 -0500
Received: from [172.16.18.67] ([172.16.18.67]:9092 "EHLO
	passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129092AbRBLL21>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:28:27 -0500
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
X-Accept-Language: en_GB
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0102121118580.10132-100000@acms23> 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0102121118580.10132-100000@acms23> 
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@ragingbull.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lkml subject line 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:28:16 +0000
Message-ID: <8726.981977296@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


g.liakhovetski@ragingbull.com said:
>  Wouldn't it be a good idea to prepend all lkml subjects with [LKML]
> like many other lists do to distinguish lkml messages from the rest. 

No. There are already headers you can filter on, without adding crap to the
Subject line making it even harder to skim-read l-k than it already is.	

cf. http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s3-18

--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/