Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751837AbaLRBST (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:18:19 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-f54.google.com ([209.85.192.54]:61998 "EHLO mail-qg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751783AbaLRBSR (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:18:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 22:18:07 -0300 From: Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDnez?= To: Richard Weinberger Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] UBI: Fastmap: Don't allocate new ubi_wl_entry objects Message-ID: <20141218011807.GA6626@fox> References: <1417347340-6872-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1417347340-6872-3-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1417347340-6872-3-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Richard, On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 12:35:36PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > There is no need to allocate new ones every time, we can reuse > the existing ones. > This makes the code cleaner and more easy to follow. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger > --- > drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c | 31 +++++-------------------------- > drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 11 +++++++---- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c > index db3defd..9507702 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c > @@ -1446,19 +1446,6 @@ int ubi_update_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi) > } > > new_fm->used_blocks = ubi->fm_size / ubi->leb_size; > - > - for (i = 0; i < new_fm->used_blocks; i++) { > - new_fm->e[i] = kmem_cache_alloc(ubi_wl_entry_slab, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!new_fm->e[i]) { > - while (i--) > - kfree(new_fm->e[i]); > - > - kfree(new_fm); > - mutex_unlock(&ubi->fm_mutex); > - return -ENOMEM; > - } > - } > - > old_fm = ubi->fm; > ubi->fm = NULL; > > @@ -1494,12 +1481,9 @@ int ubi_update_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi) > ubi_err(ubi, "could not erase old fastmap PEB"); > goto err; > } > - > - new_fm->e[i]->pnum = old_fm->e[i]->pnum; > - new_fm->e[i]->ec = old_fm->e[i]->ec; > + new_fm->e[i] = old_fm->e[i]; > } else { > - new_fm->e[i]->pnum = tmp_e->pnum; > - new_fm->e[i]->ec = tmp_e->ec; > + new_fm->e[i] = tmp_e; > > if (old_fm) > ubi_wl_put_fm_peb(ubi, old_fm->e[i], i, > @@ -1524,16 +1508,13 @@ int ubi_update_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi) > i, 0); > goto err; > } > - > - new_fm->e[0]->pnum = old_fm->e[0]->pnum; > + new_fm->e[0] = old_fm->e[0]; > new_fm->e[0]->ec = ret; > } else { > /* we've got a new anchor PEB, return the old one */ > ubi_wl_put_fm_peb(ubi, old_fm->e[0], 0, > old_fm->to_be_tortured[0]); > - > - new_fm->e[0]->pnum = tmp_e->pnum; > - new_fm->e[0]->ec = tmp_e->ec; > + new_fm->e[0] = tmp_e; > } > } else { > if (!tmp_e) { > @@ -1546,9 +1527,7 @@ int ubi_update_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi) > ret = -ENOSPC; > goto err; > } > - > - new_fm->e[0]->pnum = tmp_e->pnum; > - new_fm->e[0]->ec = tmp_e->ec; > + new_fm->e[0] = tmp_e; > } > > down_write(&ubi->work_sem); > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c > index 47b215f..523d8a4 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c > @@ -1014,9 +1014,6 @@ int ubi_wl_put_fm_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_wl_entry *fm_e, > e = fm_e; > ubi_assert(e->ec >= 0); > ubi->lookuptbl[pnum] = e; > - } else { > - e->ec = fm_e->ec; > - kfree(fm_e); > } > > spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock); > @@ -2008,9 +2005,15 @@ int ubi_wl_init(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_attach_info *ai) > > dbg_wl("found %i PEBs", found_pebs); > > - if (ubi->fm) > + if (ubi->fm) { > ubi_assert(ubi->good_peb_count == \ > found_pebs + ubi->fm->used_blocks); > + > + for (i = 0; i < ubi->fm->used_blocks; i++) { > + e = ubi->fm->e[i]; > + ubi->lookuptbl[e->pnum] = e; > + } > + } Should this be in a separate patch? The commit log doesn't mention it. Looks good otherwise! > else > ubi_assert(ubi->good_peb_count == found_pebs); -- Guido Mart?nez, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/