Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:33:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:33:43 -0500 Received: from mail.zmailer.org ([194.252.70.162]:44552 "EHLO zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:33:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:33:24 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lkml subject line Message-ID: <20010212133324.B15688@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from g.liakhovetski@ragingbull.com on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:20:40AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:20:40AM +0000, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Dear all (and list maintainers in particular) > > Wouldn't it be a good idea to prepend all lkml subjects with [LKML] like > many other lists do to distinguish lkml messages from the rest. NO! Have you ever seen reply-chains resulting at such schemes ? Re: [FOO] Re: [FOO] Re: [FOO] Re: [FOO] subject text If you want to pre-filter messages traveling thru linux-kernel list, all you need to do is to check the content of Return-Path: header. Or perhaps my utter aborrence is due to the way how GNU MAILMAN handles that tagging (badly, that is). > Thanks > Guennadi > ___ > Dr. Guennadi V. Liakhovetski > email: G.Liakhovetski@sheffield.ac.uk /Matti Aarnio -- vger postmaster, not listmaster - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/