Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751388AbaLRRoo (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:44:44 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:65292 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751098AbaLRRon (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:44:43 -0500 Message-ID: <54931283.1030804@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:44:35 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: Sergei Shtylyov , Paul Mackerras , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] net-PPP: Deletion of a few unnecessary checks References: <548B1E44.6050005@users.sourceforge.net> <20141212.115922.687789059853236747.davem@davemloft.net> <54930D7C.3000901@users.sourceforge.net> <20141218.122556.2148647081075440879.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20141218.122556.2148647081075440879.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:AefThGopho3XJHU6YQkT9tINvP1tjt5gOb9JnWNCa3NTOFsjT1s XX8soOGdyZN4Bwj8mob002WdQg6sUCa7Z4u0yOL1Y15wecBbCCrGtfvkC3HgxPr+OQRi4Fu dupQMqGUN2jhhLaPvnRSMdWrGKVPvnpz+PDeF7zZOC9jDF9fPkeY4tUGUU7C0gvWRhcjEOx REm3FLWLdMbKhBoaRVlBQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Now I find still that your data reorgansisation wish can not be resolved >> in a simple way. > > I'm saying to leave the code alone. It seems that there might be a misunderstanding between us. > If it goes: > > var = foo_that_returns_ptr_err() > if (IS_ERR(var)) > return PTR_ERR(var); > > p->bar = var; > > or whatever, simply keep it that way! A simple return was not used by the mppe_alloc() function so far because a bit of memory clean-up will also be useful after error detection, won't it? > I'm not engaging in this conversation any further, you have already > consumed way too much of my limited time on this incredibly trivial matter. It can occasionally happen that a safe clarification of specific implementation details will need more efforts than you would like to invest at the moment. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/