Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 05:32:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 05:32:25 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:745 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 05:32:24 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: "David S. Miller" Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ak@suse.de, paulus@samba.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modules 3/3: Sort sections In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Jan 2003 21:15:36 -0800." <20030101.211536.121172392.davem@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:35:54 +1100 Message-Id: <20030102104053.ABF0C2C0FD@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1030 Lines: 25 In message <20030101.211536.121172392.davem@redhat.com> you write: > From: Richard Henderson > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:58:36 -0800 > > On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 08:50:03PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > I think this is to get .foo.init sections. > > Obviously. Perhaps the question was worded badly. Instead read > it as "Why don't we force this to be called .init.foo instead?" > > This new naming order was created recently, but I forget the reason. > It used to be .init.foo No, it used to be .foo.init, but -ffunction-sections calls its functions .init, so it was changed to .init.foo. Of course, the simpler prefix test should now be sufficient. Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/