Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751499AbaLRTV0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:21:26 -0500 Received: from omr2.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.141.100]:35376 "EHLO omr2.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751022AbaLRTVZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:21:25 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev To: Eric Paris Cc: Paul Moore , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-audit@redhat.com, rgb@redhat.com Subject: Re: linux-next 20141216 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2849 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:50:20 -0500." <1418921420.5162.19.camel@localhost> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <2966.1418778594@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <5444.1418921116@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1418921420.5162.19.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1418930473_1952P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:21:13 -0500 Message-ID: <8832.1418930473@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1418930473_1952P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:50:20 -0500, Eric Paris said: > On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 11:45 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:09:54 -0500, Valdis Kletnieks said: > > > > > Spotted these two while booting single-user on 20141216. 20141208 > > > doesn't throw these, so it's something in the last week or so.. > > > > Gaah! Turns out that 20141208 *is* susceptible - it had been booting > > just fine for several days, but it went around the bend, apparently due > > to a userspace or initrd change. > > $5 says you updated systemd? Actually, yeah. yum.log says: Dec 12 14:08:09 Updated: systemd-218-1.fc22.x86_64 and things started going downhill that evening. Damned if I know what 218 was doing to cause the issues. (Other RPM update that looked vaguely related was for selinux-policy, but again, damned if I know what a policy file could contain that would change the behavior...) Is it worth backing it to -217, or do we have a handle on the issue and systemd is just the messenger? --==_Exmh_1418930473_1952P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBVJMpKQdmEQWDXROgAQJAsQ/+LRyvRpfXxgslVY/iQMIe9Oe1PIcV7vkj 4xEvbLwJ8OTyMcb65u/T0eqbknBBeBpufVsD2U2W2NfobL1J7c9k3UjYEI5L0wd/ 6I6KtBmx+OITTkLl0InZmzvAiVUR2/E9QrVxt+LKPySENaHh/+t+vuQ4HanPH8RO ljQbyCVCs1hDf0IOZQ3Uo8IoTClHYnMB6B/DIDB7lHfH+Fm/bieWC4yNr5ium+Gz /j+9LYC6TCdPmqt5XJDumKaEAmHmi387SXk+/Bt/1RN5kxqaZWYrZq9YO0yBswBT n4UaXMMPyYjATa2NJORl/R+XQMdebRXOeaiquGOrNBjjcJhOXCE+bdhU8NWNIuXE 3zATAQsAe7KPdCy/jzBNh/TdVi1lQU3C5ShF4hMVpq2XpREL+yR6YHgrUTs1d7vV uhuh9c8zarAcCQQUxmfb5AuZ/fxbBAyVBLQsTYHK15JzSRxmHI2hw8+hEZbFKZtV P0OcnI3HPe0sWatGYhP0wVxLjH3aT0I5lua71oJyySbf77J+JKWsGCBGkF8UHvsO Q5kG9hhBkzSIu28Gpt9mpCZnewPDyV+RsM2F/CfSFTRrNzVsyvTiiWVAbUbJihFt FSAsdHThIVFLG+kGfQ0Qv3wuxOSU6eFtsujR9d2oTuci3lKh1Ac3AgKiMQyGBPCK O+BdHSwKwLo= =UwHS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1418930473_1952P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/