Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754323AbaLVKYK (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 05:24:10 -0500 Received: from mail-bn1bon0135.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.135]:48224 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754176AbaLVKYI (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 05:24:08 -0500 X-WSS-ID: 0NGZBK1-07-6O8-02 X-M-MSG: Message-ID: <5497F130.7040508@amd.com> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:23:44 +0200 From: Oded Gabbay Organization: AMD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Roedel , CC: , John Bridgman , "Elifaz, Dana" Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Track when amd_iommu_v2 init is complete References: <1419106352-6486-1-git-send-email-oded.gabbay@amd.com> <5495DB96.6070608@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <5495DB96.6070608@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.20.0.84] X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is 165.204.84.221) smtp.mailfrom=Oded.Gabbay@amd.com; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.221;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(428002)(377454003)(51704005)(24454002)(55674003)(479174004)(189002)(199003)(31966008)(87936001)(97736003)(50986999)(59896002)(99396003)(101416001)(76176999)(21056001)(36756003)(77096005)(2950100001)(4396001)(33656002)(105586002)(86362001)(62966003)(106466001)(15975445007)(107046002)(77156002)(120916001)(23746002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(46102003)(80316001)(64126003)(68736005)(92566001)(87266999)(54356999)(84676001)(65956001)(65806001)(20776003)(50466002)(47776003)(64706001)(83506001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BN1PR02MB200;H:atltwp01.amd.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR02MB200; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004);SRVR:BN1PR02MB200; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0433DB2766 X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR02MB200; X-OriginatorOrg: amd4.onmicrosoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2014 10:24:04.2175 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: fde4dada-be84-483f-92cc-e026cbee8e96 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=fde4dada-be84-483f-92cc-e026cbee8e96;Ip=[165.204.84.221] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1PR02MB200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/20/2014 10:27 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote: > > > On 12/20/2014 10:12 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote: >> This patch adds a new exported function to amd_iommu_v2, which returns 1 if the >> amd_iommu_v2 initialization function has completed, and 0 otherwise. >> >> This is necessary for the case when amd_iommu_v2 is compiled inside the kernel >> image (not as module) and another module (e.g. amdkfd), which is also compiled >> inside the kernel image, is dependent on amd_iommu_v2 functionality. >> >> In that case, there is no mechanism in the kernel that enforces the order of >> loading between the two modules. Therefore, If the amd_iommu_v2 is loaded >> _after_ the other module, and the other module calls one of >> amd_iommu_v2 exported functions _before_ amd_iommu_v2 is loaded, than that >> function will fail, and as a result, the calling module may fail as well. >> >> Note that when the two modules are compiled as modules, this situation can't >> occur as the kernel enforces the order of loading. >> >> Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay >> --- >> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c | 11 +++++++++++ >> include/linux/amd-iommu.h | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c >> index 1e6360e..2456f18 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c >> @@ -895,6 +895,14 @@ out_unlock: >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb); >> >> +static int iommu_v2_init_completed; >> + >> +int amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed(void) >> +{ >> + return iommu_v2_init_completed; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed); >> + >> static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void) >> { >> int ret; >> @@ -903,6 +911,7 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void) >> >> if (!amd_iommu_v2_supported()) { >> pr_info("AMD IOMMUv2 functionality not available on this system\n"); >> + iommu_v2_init_completed = 1; >> /* >> * Load anyway to provide the symbols to other modules >> * which may use AMD IOMMUv2 optionally. >> @@ -919,6 +928,8 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void) >> >> amd_iommu_register_ppr_notifier(&ppr_nb); >> >> + iommu_v2_init_completed = 1; >> + >> return 0; >> >> out: >> diff --git a/include/linux/amd-iommu.h b/include/linux/amd-iommu.h >> index 2b08e79..115c03a 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/amd-iommu.h >> +++ b/include/linux/amd-iommu.h >> @@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ typedef void (*amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx)(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasid); >> extern int amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb(struct pci_dev *pdev, >> amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx cb); >> >> +extern int amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed(void); >> + >> #else >> >> static inline int amd_iommu_detect(void) { return -ENODEV; } >> > > Hi Joerg, > This patch follows our IRC conversations from the last week. > Last update from me was that using subsys_initcall instead of module_init > does enforce amd_iommu_v2 to load _before_ amdkfd (apparently I didn't check > it correctly the first time). However, this won't help us because: > 1. I don't know what effect this has when amd_iommu_v2 is compiled as module. > 2. amd_iommu_v2 depends on amd_iommu which is not subsys, so amd_iommu_v2 > init function fails when it is called this early, and thus, amd_iommu_v2 > doesn't work. > > I want to fix this situation in rc1/2, so I'm sending the complementary > patches to dri-devel in the meantime. > > Oded > _______________________________________________ > iommu mailing list > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu > Hi, The drm guys suggested we move iommu/ subsystem before gpu/ subsystem in drivers/Makefile instead of the above patch (and the complementing patch-set in amdkfd). I did that and it works, so please see this patch as discarded for now. I will send a new patch-set shortly. ODed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/