Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:39:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:39:39 -0500 Received: from mail.webmaster.com ([216.152.64.131]:63134 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:39:39 -0500 From: David Schwartz To: CC: X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.63 (1077) - Licensed Version Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:48:06 -0800 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: GPL and Nvidia Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: <20030102204808.AAA9757@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1149 Lines: 28 On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:21:59 -0500 (EST), Gerhard Mack wrote: >There are strong reasons why GPL is a good thing and I prefer it to BSD. >IMO GPL makes it easier to add code to a common base without risking >someone taking the code and adding code+theircode and releasing a >proprietary competing project what's always 3 steps ahead of the open >source version. For all the complaints it gets the GPL does what it's >designed to do and that's a good thing. I don't understand why making proprietary software better and cheaper than it would otherwise be is a bad thing. It will be better because it will have a stronger base to build on. It will be cheaper both because it will be easier to construct and because it will have to compete with free software that is more similar to it. And, believe it or not, free software benefits as much from competition as proprietary software does. DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/