Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755203AbaLVPwE (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:52:04 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:49030 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755000AbaLVPwC (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:52:02 -0500 Message-ID: <54983E8F.5060500@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:53:51 -0500 From: Boris Ostrovsky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xen-devel CC: David Vrabel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Testing preemptibility test in xen_setup_cpu_clockevents() Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org With 250a1ac685f (x86, smpboot: Remove pointless preempt_disable() in native_smp_prepare_cpus()) HVM guests no longer boot since we are hitting BUG_ON(preemptible()) in xen_setup_cpu_clockevents(). I don't think we need this test (PV or HVM), do we? -boris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/