Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:37:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:35:06 -0500 Received: from 5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.163.116]:13241 "EHLO 5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:34:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:42:38 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "" , "" , "" Subject: RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? In-Reply-To: <0f0fb5934050213DTVMAIL12@smtp.cwctv.net> Message-ID: References: <0f0fb5934050213DTVMAIL12@smtp.cwctv.net> X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 23 On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote: > "or later" perhaps copyright could be defined, and headers added to > derivative? Luckily copyright holders cannot define the scope of copyright law. This doesn't just include the (often illegal) EULAs of proprietary software companies, but also the very strict interpretation "some people" have of the GPL. Both proprietary EULAs and the GPL have to work within the law and cannot add anything illegal under the law. Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/