Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755459AbaLWIaP (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2014 03:30:15 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:32991 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754873AbaLWIaN (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2014 03:30:13 -0500 Message-ID: <54992809.7040605@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:30:01 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel To: Andy Lutomirski CC: Marcelo Tosatti , Gleb Natapov , kvm list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , glommer@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] x86, vdso, pvclock: Cleanups and speedups References: <549917F6.1080504@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/12/2014 09:16, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Any thoughts as to whether it should be tagged for stable? I haven't > looked closely enough at the old pvclock code or the generated code to > have much of an opinion there. It'll be a big speedup for non-pvclock > users at least. Yes, please. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/