Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:33:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:33:04 -0500 Received: from im1.mail.tds.net ([216.170.230.91]:43147 "EHLO im1.sec.tds.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:33:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:40:04 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Portnoy X-X-Sender: portnoy@cerberus.localhost To: Andrew Walrond cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPL and Nvidia In-Reply-To: <3E14BFBA.4070908@walrond.org> Message-ID: References: <3E14202D.4050909@walrond.org> <3E14BFBA.4070908@walrond.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 947 Lines: 23 Freedom is something that has to be perpetuated and guaranteed, which is what the GPL does. The BSD approach is this: "We're offering you this free (as in freedom) software which you can then use and redistribute as proprietary software as long as we get credit." This is like drawing up a constitution for a new country that says "We give you these rights and the power to totally eliminate them." On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Andrew Walrond wrote: > A "freedom" banner in one hand and a thick license document in the other > beginning "GPL: Thou shall not...", and a fat, smiling lawyer behind you. > > Makes me glad to be alive ;) > > The BSD license sounds great, but I bet mine's shorter :) > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/