Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 00:02:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 00:02:03 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:47525 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 00:02:02 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Subject: Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Jan 2003 23:50:10 BST." <20030102225010.GA1197@dreamland.darkstar.lan> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 16:10:19 +1100 Message-Id: <20030103051033.1A2AA2C003@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 695 Lines: 18 In message <20030102225010.GA1197@dreamland.darkstar.lan> you write: > Hi, > > I'm working on net/sched to convert it to new module interface. I'm > going to add a new field 'owner' to struct Qdisc_ops. Hmm, I thought the sched stuff all runs under the network brlock? If so, it doesn't need to be held in, since it's not preemptible. I haven't checked, though... Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/