Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267392AbTACFGl>; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 00:06:41 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267394AbTACFGl>; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 00:06:41 -0500
Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:63943 "EHLO holomorphy")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S267392AbTACFGj>;
	Fri, 3 Jan 2003 00:06:39 -0500
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:14:50 -0800
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Cc: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL and Nvidia
Message-ID: <20030103051450.GY9704@holomorphy.com>
Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>,
	David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10301021315170.421-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10301021315170.421-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1762
Lines: 36

On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:26:24PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> AH!  A man of reason here!
> It would be nice if "LI" got in the business of issuing license
> subscriptions for binary only modules.  Where the binary vendor must
> register and pay a royality fee.  This fee would be used to support "LI"
> and defend Linux in a court case if needed.
> I personally would gladly pay a reasonable (usual and customary) fee for
> the service and right to sell binary models with out having to pay a
> lawyer to write a "position" and be prepared to sue every snot nose brat
> in the world.
> Otherwise, one has to deal with unreasonable people.
> There are people who do not work for distros or have found that other
> companies want to control their contributions to GPL, but need a means to
> support themselves with there other works related to emerging
> technologies.
> Obviously I am being way to sensible about the issue, and should go use
> NetBSD instead and give them the license money.

I don't give two hoots about the money or the open/closed stuff in the
context of "Is it the right thing to do?" or "What should nvidia do?"
nvidia's drivers have developed a bad reputation, at least in my mind,
and I don't want their bugreports (even though RH was hurt worst here),
and I don't want my betatesters adding that unknown into the equation.

Supposedly they've improved lately, not that I care. One only need be
bitten once.

Maybe having no way to prove a bug's fixed is a downside of binary modules.


Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/