Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751502AbaL0PDa (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Dec 2014 10:03:30 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:41252 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079AbaL0PD0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Dec 2014 10:03:26 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 07:03:25 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dongsu Park Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Kent Overstreet , Ming Lin , Doug Gilbert , "James E.J. Bottomley" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/17] block: replace sg_iovec with iov_iter Message-ID: <20141227150325.GD1094@infradead.org> References: <20141223104401.GB27600@infradead.org> <20141223121815.GE15080@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141223121815.GE15080@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 01:18:15PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote: > I think so too. Patches #07-10 can be split into a separate patchset. > I guess they are included just because Kent tried to follow up > suggestions in the previous discussion. > I don't care about either way. So I'll split them up. In case I wasn't quite clear: I'd prefer you to send the patches that just clean existing code and API use first, and then the bio splitting series on top of that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/