Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:45:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:45:47 -0500 Received: from itg-gw.cr008.cwt.esat.net ([193.120.242.226]:35343 "EHLO dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:45:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:52:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Jakma X-X-Sender: paulj@dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com To: Rik van Riel cc: Richard Stallman , , , , , Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 879 Lines: 31 On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Rik van Riel wrote: > IMHO such freedom should leave the option of not having free drivers > to companies like Nvidia. Indeed, so why not add an exemption into the kernel's licence for binary only modules that only use module exported interfaces? The FSF's FAQ on the GPL even covers this. that would remove the whole "is it a derived work?" grey area we're talking about. > Have some faith in freedom, Richard... good call. but make it explicit in the kernel's licence. > Rik regards, -- Paul Jakma Sys Admin Alphyra paulj@alphyra.ie Warning: /never/ send email to spam@dishone.st or trap@dishone.st - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/