Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:11:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:11:00 -0500 Received: from node-d-1ea6.a2000.nl ([62.195.30.166]:13808 "EHLO laptop.fenrus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:10:58 -0500 Subject: Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com To: Avery Fay Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WFMiPXs7HlgO3C+Un5H+" Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-Id: <1041628746.1337.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-2) Date: 03 Jan 2003 22:19:07 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 916 Lines: 31 --=-WFMiPXs7HlgO3C+Un5H+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 21:25, Avery Fay wrote: > Should I get rid of IRQ load balancing? And what do you mean "Intel broke= the P4's interrupt routing"? well you can bind IRQ's to specific cpu's in /proc.... --=-WFMiPXs7HlgO3C+Un5H+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+Ff5KxULwo51rQBIRAvR6AKCWOT7K/7v9CUvhrLLN9O1CeK2H4ACgpuiP fQidERhjLzrdT2gAdQ45CBU= =dbWH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WFMiPXs7HlgO3C+Un5H+-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/