Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:28:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:28:21 -0500 Received: from vsmtp3.tin.it ([212.216.176.223]:6371 "EHLO smtp3.cp.tin.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:28:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3E161DFD.AB8D25AE@tin.it> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 23:34:21 +0000 From: "A.D.F." Reply-To: adefacc@tin.it Organization: Private X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.21 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1085 Lines: 27 FreeBSD 5.0 should already have a zero copy for mmapped files and IMHO it would be worth to have it in Linux 2.6 too. It would also be very nice to be able to enable zero copy for mmapped files by a config option. Many applications use mapped memory to serve lots of small and medium sized files (4 - 1024 KB) or even a few big files (think at web servers, i.e. Apache 2, etc.); this is done to better serve multiple / parallel downloads being done on the same files. Using or not using mmap() is a userland / application choice that depends on lots of factors / strategies that are outside kernel scope. Besides this there seems to be some work in progress to speed up mmap() calls, thus why not doing all the work right ? -- Nick Name: A.D.F. E-Mail: adefacc@tin.it E-Mail-Font: Courier New (plain text, no html) -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/