Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:49:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:49:42 -0500 Received: from pusa.informat.uv.es ([147.156.10.98]:34176 "EHLO pusa.informat.uv.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:49:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 23:58:06 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_X86_TSC_DISABLE question Message-ID: <20030103225806.GA10646@pusa.informat.uv.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: uaca@alumni.uv.es Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1243 Lines: 37 On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 05:52:55PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: Hi Mark > > > Depends on your box. Most standard SMP boxes are all clocked off the > > > same clock, so it's not an issue. > > > > Hi Martin > > > > Thanks for your reply > > > > Is there a way to verify this? or must I contact the motherboard maker and > > ask for it? how I should ask it? > > any SMP less than $50k is using a single clock to drive the CPUs, > and therefore has TSC's in sync. if you owned a numa/clustered > SMP, you'd know it - they're the only ones that need something special. Thanks for your reply I think that CONFIG_X86_TSC_DISABLE should be more informative on this Ulisses Debian GNU/Linux: a dream come true ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso ---> Visita http://www.valux.org/ para saber acerca de la <--- ---> Asociaci?n Valenciana de Usuarios de Linux <--- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/