Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 21:58:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 21:58:39 -0500 Received: from ns1.geeklords.org ([204.147.223.253]:32395 "EHLO master.geeklords.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 21:58:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 19:18:42 -0800 (PST) From: "Shane R. Stixrud" X-X-Sender: shane@master.geeklords.org To: Larry McVoy cc: Richard Stallman , , , , , , , Beth Van Eman Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? In-Reply-To: <20030104022235.GV24896@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2129 Lines: 46 On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Larry McVoy wrote: > And therein lies the problem. You and RMS agree, in his world it is > like getting your roof repaired or a new washing machine installed. I only agree with RMS to a point. Something like google or Ebay would still be very much possible in a world where most software was GPLed/BSD/etc.. Why wouldn't it be? > And we owe it all to Google. To my dieing day I will be grateful to the > Google team, I shudder to think what it would have been like without them. > And Google exists because Larry and Sergey want to be rich. It's as > simple as that. They are extremely talented and dedicated people, I > have nothing but respect for them. But it was clear that they were > shrewdly building something they knew was valuable and they wanted to > turn it into a business. [snip] For every Larry and Sergey, I am sure you know ten Tom, Dick and Harry's who slave away doing amazing things at a large software development house. Besides, my reading of the GPL suggests you only need to publish source code _IF_ you distribute it to a 3rd party. In house software development would not qualify. > > If they had known that if they built it and anyone could steal their > technology because it was all free software, there is ZERO chance that > they would have done it. They are bright people, they would have found > some other way to use their talents. For me, it's a damn good thing > that they live in our current world, not your world or RMS' world. > Those are gray, boring, dull worlds. No thanks. > Again I don't see why Google or Ebay wouldn't exist in a Free Software world nor do I see why Larry and Sergey wouldn't make a butt load. I think it is important to remember that copyright law was not designed to make you or anyone else "rich". Copyright law is concerned with promoting societies progress. Shane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/