Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:19:59 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@gmail.com>,
        "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [capabilities] Allow normal inheritance for a configurable set
 of capabilities
In-Reply-To: <20150203154651.GC2923@mail.hallyn.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502031119370.6368@gentwo.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502021018500.5029@gentwo.org> <54CFB9B8.8020701@schaufler-ca.com> <20150202180806.GE24351@ubuntumail> <CALCETrXgodHNiEspXKbAm_xGfBtE6n4diESQzp5Rq8xyW14F2w@mail.gmail.com> <20150203154651.GC2923@mail.hallyn.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 595
Lines: 14

On Tue, 3 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

> So again I think the pA seems like an elegant way to work around this.
> I'm interested in other ideas, but I worry about the proc solution Christoph
> proposed because it would be system- or namespace-wide, rather than
> per-process.

Ok can we have a patch that realizes this? Maybe only a rough one?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/