Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 10:12:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 10:12:48 -0500 Received: from elin.scali.no ([62.70.89.10]:9234 "EHLO elin.scali.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 10:12:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 16:23:54 +0100 (CET) From: Steffen Persvold X-X-Sender: sp@sp-laptop.isdn.scali.no To: "David S. Miller" , Jeff Garzik , Subject: NAPI and tg3 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1347 Lines: 36 Hi guys, I have access to 8 Dell 2650s with onboard Broadcom BCM5701 chips. They are quipped with Dual 2.4 GHz Xeon processors and 1GB of RAM. I'm running RedHat 7.3, but with a stock 2.4.20 kernel. As I understand it the tg3 driver is using NAPI on the 2.4.20 kernel (dev->poll). I've been experiencing bad performance (low bandwidth) on cluster applications running with LAM for example, but the problem manifest itself if you run two bandwidth needy applications in parallel on two machines (i.e two processes on each machine, one per processor) using Gbe. I've disabled the NAPI mode and went back to the old interrupt method and this works much better (i.e the bandwidth is now evenly distributed between the two applications). What could be the cause of this problem ? Is it NAPI itself (doing RX under scheduler control) or is it something else (for example lock contetion). Any ideas ? Thanks, -- Steffen Persvold | Scali AS mailto:sp@scali.com | http://www.scali.com Tel: (+47) 2262 8950 | Olaf Helsets vei 6 Fax: (+47) 2262 8951 | N0621 Oslo, NORWAY - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/