Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161177AbbBDQxS (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:53:18 -0500 Received: from h1446028.stratoserver.net ([85.214.92.142]:54754 "EHLO mail.ahsoftware.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932877AbbBDQxP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:53:15 -0500 Message-ID: <54D24E74.9010103@ahsoftware.de> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:53:08 +0100 From: Alexander Holler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBDemVybmVy?= CC: Michael Kerrisk , Al Viro , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linux-Fsdevel , Linux Kernel , Linux API Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only) References: <1422896713-25367-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <1422896713-25367-2-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <20150203060542.GZ29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <54D071AA.1030302@ahsoftware.de> <20150203075616.GA29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <54D08BF4.3000903@ahsoftware.de> <54D093A0.7090201@ahsoftware.de> <54D0C3B8.2050507@ahsoftware.de> <20150203174839.GD2509@thunk.org> <54D10D0E.8090204@ahsoftware.de> <20150203233332.GE29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <54D1F215.9030404@ahsoftware.de> <54D20F02.5050700@ahsoftware.de> <54D21CC8.4020705@ahsoftware.de> <54D24504.6080201@ahsoftware.de> <54D24CA5.6080603@ahsoftware.de> In-Reply-To: <54D24CA5.6080603@ahsoftware.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1573 Lines: 45 Am 04.02.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Alexander Holler: > Am 04.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Lukáš Czerner: >> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote: > >>> Am 04.02.2015 um 15:52 schrieb Lukáš Czerner: >>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote: >>> >>>>> I'm happy for all the feedback. But it doesn't help me. I'm not >>>>> going to spend >>>>> the necessary time unpaid. >>>> >>>> Right, you'd much rather have someone else to spend the time on your >>>> request unpaid. That's understandable, but unreasonable. You want >>>> it, implement it, or pay someone else to do it for you. >>> >>> Maybe you should attach a big fat red warning to the kernels bugzilla >>> that filing a bug means either to fix it yourself or pay somone to do >>> that. >>> >>> I've never demanded that someone else fixes it. >>> >>> I've just explained a problem. >>> >>> Unbelievable how someone could do such without paying someone else to >>> fix it or by fixing it themself ... >> >> It's not a bug, you're requesting a feature. >> > > Ok, I'm guilty. > > May I ask if there's somewhere a feature request tracker which doesn't > cruzify someone because he suggest a (maybe wrong) solution and tries to > show that this might work with some prelimary, broken, silly, quick and > dirty patches? I guess the answer is FreeBSD or similiar. ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/