Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966980AbbBDRxW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:53:22 -0500 Received: from foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com ([217.140.108.86]:41247 "EHLO foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966708AbbBDRxU (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:53:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:52:56 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Timur Tabi Cc: "msalter@redhat.com" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Will Deacon , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Sudeep Holla , "jcm@redhat.com" , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Daniel Lezcano , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Robert Richter , Randy Dunlap , Charles Garcia-Tobin , "phoenix.liyi@huawei.com" , Ashwin Chaugule , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , Mark Langsdorf , "wangyijing@huawei.com" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/21] acpi: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64 Message-ID: <20150204175256.GH26006@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1422881149-8177-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1422881149-8177-3-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <2422968.Es7R0p3loO@vostro.rjw.lan> <1422984576.18187.82.camel@deneb.redhat.com> <20150204112508.GB26006@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <1423066107.18187.99.camel@deneb.redhat.com> <54D245E2.2030003@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54D245E2.2030003@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 978 Lines: 23 On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:16:34PM +0000, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 02/04/2015 10:08 AM, Mark Salter wrote: > > acpi_os_remap() is used to map ACPI tables. These tables may be in ram > > which are already included in the kernel's linear RAM mapping. So we > > need ioremap_cache to avoid two mappings to the same physical page > > having different caching attributes. > > Would it be possible to modify ioremap() so that it can tell whether the > memory is already mapped in some way, and then use a compatible remapping? No. We have some semantics for ioremap() and it should return non-cacheable mapping. ioremap_cache() checks whether the page is RAM already and returns the existing kernel linear mapping on arm64. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/