Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129146AbRBLSGF>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:06:05 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129426AbRBLSFz>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:05:55 -0500
Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:772 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129146AbRBLSFm>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:05:42 -0500
Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.19pre10
To: cowboy@vnet.ibm.com (Richard A Nelson)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:06:17 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0102121253340.22778-100000@badlands.lexington.ibm.com> from "Richard A Nelson" at Feb 12, 2001 01:00:24 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E14SNMh-0007fo-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> First, I'm glad I wasn't hallucinating, and that the mail did indeed get
> seen by someone.
> 
> Second, instead of reverting, can't we simply move those two lines up a
> bit:

Possibly but its a minor item that doesnt really matter anyway so leaving it
is fine
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/