Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261600AbTADWQW>; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:16:22 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261581AbTADWQW>; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:16:22 -0500
Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:28371 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S261600AbTADWQU>;
	Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:16:20 -0500
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 14:23:30 -0800
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
       mark@mark.mielke.cc, billh@gnuppy.monkey.org, paul@clubi.ie,
       riel@conectiva.com.br, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net
Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
Message-ID: <20030104222330.GA1386@work.bitmover.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
	mark@mark.mielke.cc, billh@gnuppy.monkey.org, paul@clubi.ie,
	riel@conectiva.com.br, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net
References: <20030102013736.GA2708@gnuppy.monkey.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301020245080.8691-100000@fogarty.jakma.org> <20030102055859.GA3991@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20030102061430.GA23276@mark.mielke.cc> <E18UIZS-0006Cr-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <20030103040612.GA10651@work.bitmover.com> <20030104220651.GA30907@merlin.emma.line.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030104220651.GA30907@merlin.emma.line.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2296
Lines: 49

On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 11:06:51PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> It's useful to have people around that think in other directions, they
> make up for innovation. Linux is an offspring of such people's thoughts.

Linux is a copy of Unix.  There is very little new stuff in Linux.
All of the innovation is built on top of a copy of a commercial work.

To date, nothing remotely as influential as Unix has come out of the
open source community.  Sure, there are a ton of copies of existing work,
that's not what I'm talking about.  I'm talking about new things.  I keep
coming back to this because some of you refuse to get it.  It costs A LOT
OF MONEY TO MAKE NEW STUFF.  Because we are stupid, we all make a lot of
mistakes, we throw away those mistakes.  The free software model doesn't
generate 1/1000th of the money it would take to make progress continue
at its current rate in the software world.  Don't believe me?  Cool.
Go start a company, GPL your work, get back to me in 5 years and show
me how well it worked.

Other than distributions, where are those free software success stories?
Oh, yes, Cygnus.  They were doing about $25M/year or so when redhat bought
them.  Whoopee.  And Red Hat, *with* Cygnus, is doing all of $80M/year.
And we all agree that they are the leader in the free software financial
success stories, right?  Who's bigger?  IBM?  Let's see, spent $1B and
by their own statements "almost have made that back".  Hmm, running at
a loss but going to make it up on volume.

Now let's compare to some closed source companies:

	Company		Factor more revenue than Red Hat
	Microsoft	370
	Oracle		116
	Sun		150

You get the idea.  Sun makes more in 2 days than Red Hat makes all year.
It doesn't even take Microsoft a whole day to make what Red Hat makes in
a year.

> This is exaggerated, but it might help stepping back and looking at the
> WHOLE system.

Indeed.  Look over your shoulder.  That's me, stepped way farther back than you.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/