Message-ID: <54D342EF.40606@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:16:15 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, phoenix.liyi@huawei.com,
        Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>,
        suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>,
        wangyijing@huawei.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
References: <1422881149-8177-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <54D2812E.9060804@codeaurora.org>
In-Reply-To: <54D2812E.9060804@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2149
Lines: 73

On 2015年02月05日 04:29, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 06:45 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is the v8 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1, there
>> are
>> some updates since v7:
>
> All 21 patches:
>
> Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>

Hi Timur, thank you very much :)

>
> I no longer need to use "acpi=force", so that's nice.
>
>>
>>   - Add two more documantation to explain why we need ACPI in ARM64
>> servers
>
> "documentation"
>
>
>>     by Grant, and recommendations and prohibitions on the use of the
>> numerous
>>     ACPI tables and objects by Al Stone.
>>
>>   - Add two patches which is need to map acpi tables after
>> acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap
>>     is set
>>
>>   - Add another patch "dt / chosen: Add linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb
>> property"
>>     to address that if firmware providing no dtb, we can try ACPI
>> configuration data
>>     even if no "acpi=force" is passed in early parameters. (I think
>> ACPI for XEN and
>>     kexec need consider sperately as disscussed, correct me if I'm
>> wrong).
>
> "need to be considered separately", "discussed"
>
>>
>>   - Add CC in the patch to the subsystem maintainers and modify the
>> subject
>>     of the patch to explicitly show the subsystem touched by this
>> patch set,
>>     please help us to review and ack them if they make sense, thanks.
>>
>>   - Add Tested-by from Qualcomm and Redhat;
>>
>>   - Make ACPI depends on PCI suggested by Catalin;
>>
>>   - Clean up SMP init function as Lorenzo suggested, remove physical
>>     CPU hot-plug code in the patch;
>>
>>   - Address some comments from Marc and explicitly state that will
>>     implment statcked irqdomain and GIC init framework when GICv3 and
>
> "implement", "stacked"

Sorry for that, I'm not a native English speaker but I'm glad that you
you got the meaning of what I said :)

Thank you again for the test.

Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/