Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:34:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:34:46 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:32158 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:34:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:33:50 -0500 (EST) From: Richard A Nelson X-X-Sender: To: Alan Cox cc: Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.19pre10:x! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-No-Markup: yes x-No-ProductLinks: yes x-No-Archive: yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > First, I'm glad I wasn't hallucinating, and that the mail did indeed get > > seen by someone. > > > > Second, instead of reverting, can't we simply move those two lines up a > > bit: > > Possibly but its a minor item that doesnt really matter anyway so leaving it > is fine Ah, but it does matter ! We break compatibility with other systems (and our manpages, and possibly standards) if we don't mark the segment IPC_PRIVATE upon removal - Marking the segment IPC_PRIVATE allows its continued use by those alread connected to the segment (until the count drops to zero, and its deleted), but *prevents* new users from attaching to the segment. I started down this road because we weren't marking the segment, was delighted to see it done in pre3 - but it seemed like the setting wasn't always done ;-{ -- Rick Nelson Life'll kill ya -- Warren Zevon Then you'll be dead -- Life'll kill ya - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/