Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757768AbbBERJH (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:09:07 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0028.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.28]:52882 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752174AbbBERJF (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:09:05 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:973:982:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2692:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3872:3873:3874:4250:4321:5007:6261:7522:9545:10004:10400:10848:11026:11232:11658:11914:12043:12517:12519:12555:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: show56_14addd0902b0d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2496 Message-ID: <1423156139.4752.1.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: use of opaque subject lines From: Joe Perches To: Al Viro Cc: Andreas Ruprecht , Oleg Drokin , Andreas Dilger , Greg Kroah-Hartman , HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lad, Prabhakar" Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:08:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20150205163053.GQ29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1422884203-27173-1-git-send-email-rupran@einserver.de> <20150202141606.GY29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <54CFCC46.40909@einserver.de> <20150205163053.GQ29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1561 Lines: 44 On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 16:30 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:13:10PM +0100, Andreas Ruprecht wrote: > > > On a serious note: I do understand what you're getting at, I don't take > > that personally (and I will send a v2 addressing the things above), but > > honestly, this kind of answer might just be a real turn-off for other > > people trying to get into kernel development... > > > > I don't want to start a whole new 'attitude in the kernel community' > > discussion, but I can't just let this go like that, sorry. Maybe YA checkpatch warning when patch subjects include either "checkpatch" or "sparse" would help? Something like: --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 3642b0d..b6bed59 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -2170,6 +2170,13 @@ sub process { } } +# Check email subject for poor style + if ($in_header_lines && + $line =~ /^Subject:.*\b(?:checkpatch|sparse)\b[^:]/i) { + WARN("EMAIL_SUBJECT", + "A patch subject line should describe the change not the tool that found it\n" . $herecurr); + } + # Check for old stable address if ($line =~ /^\s*cc:\s*.*?.*$/i) { ERROR("STABLE_ADDRESS", -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/