Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:15:52 +0100
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
        boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 0/2] x86/xen: add xen hypercall
	preemption
Message-ID: <20150205181551.GW19988@wotan.suse.de>
References: <1422323467-16713-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <54D36653.7010207@citrix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54D36653.7010207@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1160
Lines: 27

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:47:15PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 27/01/15 01:51, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
> > 
> > This v5 nukes tracing as David said it was useless, it also
> > only adds support for 64-bit as its the only thing I can test,
> > and slightly modifies the documentation in code as to why we
> > want this. The no krobe thing is left in place as I haven't
> > heard confirmation its kosher to remove it.
> 
> FYI, I went back an reviewed my last v4 patch and folded the
> xen_end_upcall() change into it instead.
> 
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-02/msg00682.html
> 
> This will be easier for arm/arm64 to make use of in the future since
> there are fewer arch-specific changes.

I had taken similar approach first and determined using pt_regs was
safer after advice from Andy. I'll provide feedback on your new patchset.

 Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/