Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261523AbTAEBOx>; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 20:14:53 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262210AbTAEBOx>; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 20:14:53 -0500
Received: from 5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.163.116]:32463 "EHLO
	5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261523AbTAEBOw>; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 20:14:52 -0500
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 23:22:44 -0200 (BRST)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com
To: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
cc: andrew@indranet.co.nz, "" <andre@linux-ide.org>,
       "" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!
In-Reply-To: <E18UxyD-00048W-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.50L.0301042316260.2429-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10301031425590.421-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
 <15900000.1041638213@localhost.localdomain> <E18UxyD-00048W-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org
X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1830
Lines: 47

On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Richard Stallman wrote:

> I would rather look for constructive alternatives than just criticize.
> In such a situation, I would look for a way to make the program free.

> If there is no easy way to make the same program free, there may be a
> harder way.

There is of course the business model used by the ghostscript
people, used by tytso when he made resize2fs and also used by
Andre Hedrick:

1) write the software, sell it for a profit for some period
   of time (eg. 18 months)

2) after that, release the program and its source code

To the copyright holder, this has all the benefits of a strictly
copyrighted work, ie. funding. It also has the additional benefit
of having free software out there that lags close enough to your
commercial program that a competitor has no chance of entering
the market with a non-free product of mediocre quality.

To the free software community, it has the benefits of free
software becoming available at a higher speed than what would
have happened without any funding at all.

Of course, the copyright holder has to choose a license like the
GPL when releasing the software as open source, since otherwise
the competitors would be able to use the older version as a basis
to develop their commercial product from.

To me, this looks like a win/win situation and I hope more
companies will choose this business model.

regards,

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/