Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:52:40 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sonymobile.com>,
        "lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Support different config and dev of_nodes in
 regulator_register
Message-ID: <20150206005239.GD3218@sonymobile.com>
References: <54D2A91D.5090700@sonymobile.com>
 <20150205015945.GQ21293@sirena.org.uk>
 <54D3A96B.2020704@sonymobile.com>
 <20150205174353.GA21293@sirena.org.uk>
 <54D3B858.9060103@sonymobile.com>
 <20150205192740.GL21293@sirena.org.uk>
 <20150205220844.GA3218@sonymobile.com>
 <20150206003212.GR21293@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150206003212.GR21293@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 910
Lines: 24

On Thu 05 Feb 16:32 PST 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:08:54PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> 
> > However this only works for the non-supply regulator properties - and
> > this is where Tim's patch is trying to sort out.
> 
> No, this works completely fine for supply properties - to repeat what I
> said in reply to the original patch the supply is a supply to the chip
> not to an individual IP on the chip.

It does make some sense to consider the vbus-supply being connected to
the block, rather than directly to the vbus-switch. So it would work for
Tim's use case.

Thanks for repeating yourself and sorry about that.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/