Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:06:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:05:54 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de ([194.112.123.193]:47365 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:05:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 23:05:38 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: "Jeff V. Merkey" Cc: mingo@elte.hu, Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Message-ID: <20001031230538.A9048@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <39FF3F0B.81A1EE13@timpanogas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <39FF3F0B.81A1EE13@timpanogas.org>; from jmerkey@timpanogas.org on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 02:52:11PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 02:52:11PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > The numbers don't lie. You know where the code is. You notice that > there is a version of > the kernel hand coded in assembly language. You'l also noticed that > it's SMP and takes ZERO LOCKS during context switching, in fact, most of > the design is completely lockless. I suspect most of the confusion in this thread comes because you seem to use a different definition of context switch than Ingo and others. Could you explain what you exactly mean with a context switch ? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/