Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759072AbbBHXGH (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:06:07 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:54793 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758588AbbBHXGE (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:06:04 -0500 From: Peter =?iso-8859-15?q?H=FCwe?= To: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm, tpm_tis: fix TPM 2.0 probing Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 00:08:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.18.5-dirty; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Ashley Lai , Marcel Selhorst , tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, christophe.ricard@gmail.com, jason.gunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, trousers-tech@lists.sourceforge.net References: <1423059669-31734-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1423059669-31734-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201502090008.47986.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:XbVLLZZRV0gU0zWYY44jnk0l79C4Kdx3PCtYSZvF/WjB2hd+C90 SEjINyBvqy3GIG/eLSDL6NE/HXZIl5+zmZ1KLn8/DA05QglU1JxONbnRc2acXZjBprmpS4r LxOoG42/36ME5Zdo25iNgnAmMyP+ZP2YWpGI9XGUrlSVaA0W7IOxnbKEoOHWSK+M2wklujz 4Tb2Jr0PH4bANmF51SvNA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4675 Lines: 128 Am Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2015, 15:21:09 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen: > If during transmission system error was returned, the logic was to > incorrectly deduce that chip is a TPM 1.x chip. This patch fixes this > issue. Also, this patch changes probing so that message tag is used as the > measure for TPM 2.x, which should be much more stable. Is it aware that some TPMs may respond with 0x00C1 as TAG for TPM1.2 commands? > A separate function > called tpm2_probe() is encapsulated because it can be used with any > chipset. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 3 ++- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 11 ++++------- > 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > index 7b0727c..a4b0f5e 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > @@ -435,4 +435,5 @@ extern int tpm2_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip, u16 > startup_type); extern int tpm2_shutdown(struct tpm_chip *chip, u16 > shutdown_type); extern unsigned long tpm2_calc_ordinal_duration(struct > tpm_chip *, u32); extern int tpm2_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip); > -extern int tpm2_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip *chip, bool quiet); > +extern int tpm2_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip *chip); > +extern int tpm2_probe(struct tpm_chip *chip); > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > index 1abe650..49cd354 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > @@ -598,20 +598,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_do_selftest); > /** > * tpm2_gen_interrupt() - generate an interrupt > * @chip: TPM chip to use > - * @quiet: surpress the error message > * > * 0 is returned when the operation is successful. If a negative number is > * returned it remarks a POSIX error code. If a positive number is > returned * it remarks a TPM error. > */ > -int tpm2_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip *chip, bool quiet) > +int tpm2_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > - const char *desc = NULL; > u32 dummy; > > - if (!quiet) > - desc = "attempting to generate an interrupt"; > - > - return tpm2_get_tpm_pt(chip, TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES, &dummy, desc); > + return tpm2_get_tpm_pt(chip, 0x100, &dummy, > + "attempting to generate an interrupt"); Why the change from TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES = 6 to 0x100 and what does 0x100 stand for? > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_gen_interrupt); > + > +/** > + * tpm2_probe() - probe TPM 2.0 > + * @chip: TPM chip to use > + * > + * Send idempotent TPM 2.0 command and see whether TPM 2.0 chip replied > based on + * the reply tag. > + */ > +int tpm2_probe(struct tpm_chip *chip) > +{ > + struct tpm2_cmd cmd; > + int rc; > + > + cmd.header.in = tpm2_get_tpm_pt_header; > + cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.cap_id = cpu_to_be32(TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES); > + cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_id = cpu_to_be32(0x100); > + cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_cnt = cpu_to_be32(1); > + > + rc = tpm_transmit(chip, (const char *) &cmd, sizeof(cmd)); > + if (rc < 0) > + return rc; > + else if (rc < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS) > + chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe); > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c > index 6725bef..ee6e0bd 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c > @@ -639,12 +639,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, > acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle, goto out_err; > } > > - /* Every TPM 2.x command has a higher ordinal than TPM 1.x commands. > - * Therefore, we can use an idempotent TPM 2.x command to probe TPM 2.x. > - */ > - rc = tpm2_gen_interrupt(chip, true); > - if (rc == 0 || rc == TPM2_RC_INITIALIZE) > - chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; > + rc = tpm2_probe(chip); > + if (rc) > + goto out_err; > > vendor = ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_DID_VID(0)); > chip->vendor.manufacturer_id = vendor; > @@ -747,7 +744,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle > acpi_dev_handle, > > /* Generate Interrupts */ > if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) > - tpm2_gen_interrupt(chip, false); > + tpm2_gen_interrupt(chip); > else > tpm_gen_interrupt(chip); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/