Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:14:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:14:26 -0500 Received: from lakemtao03.cox.net ([68.1.17.242]:23168 "EHLO lakemtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:14:25 -0500 Message-ID: <3E18CC4D.1020604@cox.net> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 18:22:37 -0600 From: David van Hoose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hps@intermeta.de CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Honest does not pay here ... References: <200301041809.KAA06893@adam.yggdrasil.com> <3E18B76B.8050803@cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2136 Lines: 42 Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > David van Hoose writes: > > >>Binary-only drivers are great as long as they work. Every such driver I >>have used so far has worked perfectly. >>I have only one problem with NVidia's driver: It refuses to compile >>under 2.5.54 which requires me use X's nv driver or use 2.4.21 for KDE. >>Anyone know how to get around that? :-) > > > You get what you paid for. Go to the nVidia support forum and complain > loudly. That's what it is there for. I'd probably say that they tell > you to stick to the "released versions of Linux". If you consider this > support policy sucky, well there is the ATI Radeon chip... Very true. And if they don't want to support the beta kernel, that's there choice. I'd rather them throw a driver in for people that use the beta kernel for possibly testing new chipsets, know whether or not they need to do revisions before their own driver can be released, and so when the beta kernel is finally released that they'll have a driver right then to provide. The impression I am getting from the GPL argument is that people want 100% opensource drivers. Well, to be frank, I'd rather have a driver that isn't 100% opensource to no driver at all. I think most everyone on this mailing list agrees. If not, I'd like to know why. Personally, I think Andre does a lot of good for the kernel. I don't know of many desktop systems that don't use IDE. Without someone like Andre to keep up support as well as he does, IMO a lot of people would get left unsupported and end up not using Linux. Less Linux users means less demand for Linux support from mainstream developers and hardware companies. People want a name to be able to communicate to when they are having issues. Some will find their way to this mailing list, but others will look for something that has (or has better) support. -David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/