Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762047AbbBJFv2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:51:28 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com ([209.85.192.43]:48196 "EHLO mail-qg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762010AbbBJFv0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:51:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:51:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 linux-trace 1/8] tracing: attach eBPF programs to tracepoints and syscalls To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Masami Hiramatsu , Linux API , Network Development , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 707 Lines: 16 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Looks like this is entirely perf based and does not interact with > ftrace at all. In other words, it's perf not tracing. > > It makes more sense to go through tip than the tracing tree. well, all of earlier series were based on ftrace only, but I was given convincing enough arguments that perf_even_open+ioctl is a better interface :) Ok. will rebase on tip in the next version. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/