Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752224AbbBJOsy (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:48:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:39963 "EHLO mail-pd0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751201AbbBJOsw (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:48:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:18:44 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Bas Peters Cc: Pushpendra Singh , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, navin.patidar@gmail.com, gmate.amit@gmail.com, manuel.schoelling@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] staging: rtl8188eu: hal: removed code indent error Message-ID: <20150210144844.GB16435@sudip-PC> References: <1423573373-820-1-git-send-email-pushpendra.singh@smartplayin.com> <1423573373-820-2-git-send-email-pushpendra.singh@smartplayin.com> <20150210141307.GB15593@sudip-PC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1455 Lines: 31 On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:27:11PM +0100, Bas Peters wrote: > >> @@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ void rtl88eu_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower(struct adapter *adapt, u8 *powerlevel) > >> ptr++; > >> } > >> } > >> - rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction, > >> - &pwrtrac_value); > >> + rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction, &pwrtrac_value); > > you are introducing one warning to fix one error. line over 80 character. > > Isn't that warning more of a guideline, rather than an actual warning? > This seems more readable than: > > - rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction, > - &pwrtrac_value); > + rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, > + > &direction, &pwrtrac_value); CodingStyle says "Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible chunks, unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does not hide information" i agree that this is more readable but can it be called significant improvement ? but ofcourse final decision is on Greg. sudip > > Bas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/