Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756150AbbBLOUM (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:20:12 -0500 Received: from e28smtp03.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.3]:52085 "EHLO e28smtp03.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755646AbbBLOUG (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:20:06 -0500 Message-ID: <54DCB703.9020109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:51:55 +0530 From: Raghavendra K T Organization: IBM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oleg Nesterov CC: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, waiman.long@hp.com, davej@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, jeremy@goop.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, ak@linux.intel.com, jasowang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, riel@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, a.ryabinin@samsung.com, sasha.levin@oracle.com, dave@stgolabs.net Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions References: <1423741647-2156-1-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150212133707.GA10232@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150212133707.GA10232@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15021214-0009-0000-0000-000003ED62E0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1081 Lines: 35 On 02/12/2015 07:07 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 02/12, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> >> @@ -772,7 +773,8 @@ __visible void kvm_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t want) >> * check again make sure it didn't become free while >> * we weren't looking. >> */ >> - if (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) == want) { >> + head = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head); >> + if (__tickets_equal(head, want)) { >> add_stats(TAKEN_SLOW_PICKUP, 1); > > While at it, perhaps it makes sense to s/ACCESS_ONCE/READ_ONCE/ but this > is cosmetic. yes.. will do. > > We also need to change another user of enter_slow_path, xen_lock_spinning() > in arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c. > Had in mind but forgot before sending. will update resend. > Other than that looks correct at first glance... but this is up to > maintainers. > Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/