Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756102AbbBLPQE (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:16:04 -0500 Received: from mail-bn1on0098.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.98]:18495 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755505AbbBLPQC (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:16:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:00:06 +0100 From: Michal Simek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?U8O2cmVuIEJyaW5rbWFubg==?= , "Michal Simek" CC: Mark Rutland , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "monstr@monstr.eu" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , Russell King , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Steffen Trumtrar , Kumar Gala , Peter Crosthwaite , Ian Campbell , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Josh Cartwright , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: zynq: Add OCM node References: <6df19b400e314ef8228be475bb8ba83765683016.1423737765.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> <20150212105443.GB1522@leverpostej> <20150212145836.GZ18532@xsjandreislx> In-Reply-To: <20150212145836.GZ18532@xsjandreislx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-RCIS-Action: ALLOW X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-7.5.0.1018-21296.000 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes Message-ID: X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 62.221.5.235) smtp.mailfrom=michal.simek@xilinx.com; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:62.221.5.235;CTRY:GB;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(438002)(377454003)(51704005)(479174004)(164054003)(24454002)(377424004)(86362001)(6806004)(74316001)(19580405001)(23676002)(106466001)(50986999)(19580395003)(87936001)(76176999)(104016003)(83506001)(54356999)(50466002)(65806001)(561944003)(92566002)(65956001)(108616004)(15975445007)(77096005)(92726002)(2950100001)(47776003)(62966003)(93886004)(77156002)(46102003)(65826006)(107986001)(24736002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB043;H:xir-pvapsmtpgw01;FPR:;SPF:Pass;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB043; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004);SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB043; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0485417665 X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB043; X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2015 15:00:27.1839 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c;Ip=[62.221.5.235] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL2FFO11HUB043 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1670 Lines: 46 On 02/12/2015 03:58 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 12:01PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 02/12/2015 11:54 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:42:47AM +0000, Michal Simek wrote: >>>> Add OCM node for all zynq boards. OCM location >>>> can changed but for all current boards this >>>> is the location where OCM is.` >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Changes in v2: >>>> - Move node to board file suggested by Mark >>>> >>>> This patch is done based on discussion here. >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/1/396 >>>> >>>> Mark: I expect you won't like amba bus reference or >>>> am I wrong? >>> >>> I'm fine with dropping things onto a bus in this way. If we're happy to >>> do it for other nodes I don't see why busses should be special. >> >> Wonderful. I will give people some time to comment this style. > > Given that the location is discoverable, wouldn't it make sense to let > 'reg' point to the ctrl/cfg registers in the SLCR and let the driver > handle the whereabouts of the OCM location? (but I guess this is going > in circles now, such a proposal was on the table at some point, IIRC). > But I'd prefer: > memory-controller@0xfffc0000 { /* the address here would of course not match all configurations */ > interrupts = ...; > syscon = &slcr; > }; That was discussed with Arnd at that link above. Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/