Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:59:00 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Reply-To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>, Zhi Li <lznuaa@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1378197784.470306.1423767540298.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbaltgw01.schlund.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5ChJiHiUBhrRf_qqi7gTLvPp08fsfRBK+GVzvrqimKinw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1422645610-3052-1-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> <CAOMZO5DOgdUYsRUU3TXgJY+JhjF8xC_XY8EJFcrM7NHiPmSMOQ@mail.gmail.com> <54DA020C.6030703@i2se.com> <CAOMZO5DGCP1p1vetwWHpSbe2qywA8DhWRRq22egMDFSw11uq4w@mail.gmail.com> <54DA0DE7.5050708@i2se.com> <CAOMZO5AtFOThRjcAgMVbrbkcrJbehouSxoH03VUGJrRdWXnS_Q@mail.gmail.com> <462270270.419156.1423603473431.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbaltgw02.schlund.de> <CAOMZO5B4mxP6RBkbsbj=wC6bZJgtreoo5S_NhYuki6kW=Y=QFw@mail.gmail.com> <1705379122.406018.1423686677196.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbaltgw01.schlund.de> <CAOMZO5ChJiHiUBhrRf_qqi7gTLvPp08fsfRBK+GVzvrqimKinw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] clk: mxs: Fix invalid 32-bit access to frac
 registers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Medium
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1195
Lines: 48

Hi Fabio,

> Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> hat am 11. Februar 2015 um 22:10
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> wrote:
>
> >> I always get 0x5e5b5513 with or without your patch.
> >
> > very strange. Do you have any idea why IO1_STABLE is permanent low?
>
> On my case it is always 1.

i expected the same behavior on my hardware.

Do you use u-boot as bootloader?

>
> > Can you confirm the behavior according to your flash issue?
>
> In my tests IO1_STABLE stays the same.

This wasn't the intension of my second question. I wanted to know about the
state of the SPI NOR flash detection process.

Does it sucessed if you apply the patch, but revert the changes in
clk_ref_set_rate() from clk-ref.c?

>
> > I think it would be the best to revert my patch. Sorry for the trouble.
>
> To be on the safe side, I agree.
>
> Could you please send a revert patch?

Sure.

>
> Thanks
>

Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/