Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751628AbbBMAuj (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:50:39 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:58186 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750810AbbBMAug (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:50:36 -0500 From: "Jonathan \(Zhixiong\) Zhang" To: "'Hanjun Guo'" , "'Catalin Marinas'" , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" , "'Olof Johansson'" , "'Arnd Bergmann'" , "'Mark Rutland'" , "'Grant Likely'" , "'Will Deacon'" Cc: "'Lorenzo Pieralisi'" , "'Graeme Gregory'" , "'Sudeep Holla'" , "'Jon Masters'" , "'Jason Cooper'" , "'Marc Zyngier'" , "'Bjorn Helgaas'" , "'Daniel Lezcano'" , "'Mark Brown'" , "'Rob Herring'" , "'Robert Richter'" , "'Randy Dunlap'" , , , "'Timur Tabi'" , "'Ashwin Chaugule'" , , "'Mark Langsdorf'" , , , , , , References: <1422881149-8177-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:50:33 -0800 Message-ID: <003301d04727$1390fcb0$3ab2f610$@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQLTkvS5tPHL6G0j7mnnOQDWx4E3WgJjd1iYmtQCm3A= Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2375 Lines: 50 On 02/02/2015 05:45 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Al Stone > > Two more documentation files are also being added: > (1) A verbatim copy of the "Why ACPI on ARM?" blog posting by Grant Likely, > which is also summarized in arm-acpi.txt, and > > (2) A section by section review of the ACPI spec (acpi_object_usage.txt) > to note recommendations and prohibitions on the use of the numerous > ACPI tables and objects. This sets out the current expectations of > the firmware by Linux very explicitly (or as explicitly as I can, for > now). > [snip....] > +ERST Section 18.5 (signature == "ERST") > + == Error Record Serialization Table == > + Must be supplied if RAS support is provided by the platform. It > + is recommended this table be supplied. The above text related to ERST table could lead to misunderstanding. Following is what the ACPI spec (section 18.5) says: "The error record serialization feature is used to save and retrieve hardware error information to and from a persistent store. OSPM interacts with the platform through a platform interface. On UEFI-based platforms, the UEFI runtime variable services can be used to carry out error record persistence operations. On non-UEFI based platforms, the ACPI solution described below is used." When RAS support is provided by the platform, ERST table may not be supplied when it is UEFI-based and when UEFI run time service provides the ability to save and retrieve hardware error information to and from a persistent store (UEFI spec section 7.2.3). Therefore, following text might be more accurate: " On a platform supports RAS, this table must be supplied if it is not UEFI-based; if it is UEFI-based, this table may be supplied, consult your firmware vendor if you are not sure. When this table is not present, UEFI run time service will be utilized to save and retrieve hardware error information to and from a persistent store." ==== Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/