Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:41:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:41:16 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:52441 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:41:16 -0500 From: Richard Stallman To: andre@pyxtechnologies.com CC: akpm@digeo.com, riel@conectiva.com.br, andrew@indranet.co.nz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: (message from Andre Hedrick on Sun, 5 Jan 2003 20:08:23 -0800 (PST)) Subject: Re: Linux iSCSI Initiator, OpenSource (fwd) (Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!) Reply-to: rms@gnu.org References: Message-Id: Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:49:53 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1045 Lines: 31 Can you admit the follow, that GPL has everything to control redistribution, and has ZERO context for copyright. It is not clear what those words mean, so I won't agree or disagree. The holders of the copyright control the issues. That is certainly true. The copyright holders of the code can permit whatever they wish to permit, for that code. The copyright holders of Linux can permit whatever they wish to permit, for Linux. I've said this many times. The last occasion was in the message that you just responded to: > The Linux developers can certainly do this, if the copyright holders > of the substantial functions in question go along with it. When I say X and you respond by demanding angrily that I agree to X, I have to think we're failing to communicate. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/