Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753419AbbBMP7K (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:59:10 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:46778 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752853AbbBMP7E (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:59:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1423828078.4182.17.camel@pengutronix.de> References: <1423763164-5606-1-git-send-email-mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> <1423763164-5606-13-git-send-email-mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> <1423828078.4182.17.camel@pengutronix.de> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:59:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] ARM: dts: Introduce STM32F429 MCU From: Maxime Coquelin To: Philipp Zabel Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Walleij , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Arnd Bergmann , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Joe Perches , Antti Palosaari , Tejun Heo , Will Deacon , Nikolay Borisov , Rusty Russell , Kees Cook , Michal Marek , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-Arch , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1931 Lines: 58 Hi Philipp, 2015-02-13 12:47 GMT+01:00 Philipp Zabel : > Hi Maxime, > > Am Donnerstag, den 12.02.2015, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Maxime Coquelin: > [...] >> + soc { >> + reset_ahb1: reset@40023810 { >> + #reset-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset"; >> + reg = <0x40023810 0x4>; >> + }; >> + >> + reset_ahb2: reset@40023814 { >> + #reset-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset"; >> + reg = <0x40023814 0x4>; >> + }; >> + >> + reset_ahb3: reset@40023818 { >> + #reset-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset"; >> + reg = <0x40023818 0x4>; >> + }; >> + >> + reset_apb1: reset@40023820 { >> + #reset-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset"; >> + reg = <0x40023820 0x4>; >> + }; >> + >> + reset_apb2: reset@40023824 { >> + #reset-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset"; >> + reg = <0x40023824 0x4>; >> + }; > > These are mostly consecutive, single registers. I wonder if these are > part of the same IP block and thus should be grouped together into the > same reset controller node? What I could to is to have two instances. One for AHB and one for APB domain. Doing this, I will have one instance per domain, and only consecutive registers. Is it fine for you? Thanks, Maxime > > regards > Philipp > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/