Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:22:54 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>, zmxu@marvell.com,
        jszhang@marvell.com, mturquette@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: berlin: refactor the clock
Message-ID: <20150213192254.GB17976@lunn.ch>
References: <1423845781-7480-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
 <20150213173121.GG26475@lunn.ch>
 <20150213191928.20f79ebf@free-electrons.com>
 <54DE4391.4080207@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54DE4391.4080207@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 830
Lines: 19

> >DT bindings of this platform as "unstable", just like the AT91 guys did
> >for their DT bindings
> >(http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README#n100) ?
> 
> Sounds like a plan.

So we all seem to agree that we should break backwards compatibility
with the current binding. And we should explicitly document that
things are currently unstable. I would also suggest putting a comment
about being unstable into the .dts files as well. The .dts files are
more visible to potential users than the binding documents.

     Andrew

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/