Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:25:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:25:00 -0500 Received: from holly.csn.ul.ie ([136.201.105.4]:3496 "EHLO holly.csn.ul.ie") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:25:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:33:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Dave Airlie X-X-Sender: airlied@skynet To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: dummy ethernet driver In-Reply-To: <1041864865.17472.5.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1161 Lines: 32 > On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 05:57, Dave Airlie wrote: > > the patch is attached.. is there any reason why the dummy device doesn't > > want to do this stuff? I'm just submitting the patch as a request for > > comments on why this isn't done anyway in the dummy > > If you want to talk to local systems why don't you use the netlink > interface/ethertap stuff ? because I'm unconscionably lazy, and the VAX simulator code is already written to use pcap and I'd rather not rewrite it, why fix something when a quick hack will suffice :-) my long term plan is too ethertap the simulator alright.. but moving along the Linux/VAX project is primary, fixing simulator isn't :-) I'm just wondering why dummy just do that bit more.. design decision? or nobodys ever bothered? Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied@skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/